Yet more logo submissions
23rd June 2005
After I previewed the first 23 submissions yesterday, a further 19 landed in my inbox today. Again, it’s a mixed bag, and I’m really starting to warm to some of them now. You’ve until the 25th if you wish to submit a logo, but do scan the rules and background first. As always, your feedback is welcomed…
24.
25.
26.
27.
28.
29.
30.
31.
32.
33.
34.
35.
36.
37.
38.
39.
40.
41.
42.
Responses
# Steve P. Sharpe responded on 23rd June 2005 with...
I like #34.
Having said that, a couple of people have gone for the heart thing.
# Steve P. Sharpe responded on 23rd June 2005 with...
Better than a badger a I guess! lol, or is it?
# Jeremy Flint responded on 23rd June 2005 with...
#27 - looks similar to the Red Hat logo. Maybe just the implied shapes.
#35 - The dreaded swoosh rears its ugly head.
# Jonathan Snook responded on 23rd June 2005 with...
#34 reminds me a little of the love connection. I think you might have a tough time deciding. If not, I’m sure you’ll just pick mine. ;)
# James Bennett responded on 23rd June 2005 with...
#26 and #33 are probably the most appropriate to the subject matter. #39 isn’t bad. #24 is a bit too harsh, and #44 honestly makes me think of too many health-care logos (I used to work in the field, so I saw a fair number of them).
# Hayo Bethlehem responded on 23rd June 2005 with...
are 36-42 submitted by the same person or are those colours just a coincidence?
# quis responded on 23rd June 2005 with...
Looks like 36-42 have been spending a long time studying Design Cliches over at SpeakUp…
# Martin Smith responded on 23rd June 2005 with...
Wow! Round Two is certainly a step up! #25 is best of this bunch for me but Im not keen on the font?
# Simon Clayson responded on 23rd June 2005 with...
The lack of a badger is bringing on a sense of loss in me.
# Faruk Ateş responded on 23rd June 2005 with...
In no particular order, I like these:
- 30, but with slightly different colors
- 33 (*gasp* *shock*)
- 38 (though I do think the font could benefit from a bit more strength)
# Simon Snorkeller responded on 23rd June 2005 with...
What do we want? A badger! When do we want it? Now!
# Rob Waring responded on 23rd June 2005 with...
Should have guessed that would turn up eventually. “Badger, Badger, Badger, Badger”.
Can I add 27 to my list but with a different colour.
# Tris responded on 23rd June 2005 with...
27 for me would look cool on a site and on print, maybe a fair point about the colour choice never been over the top about green.
31 is mad and is it just me or does anyone see a ladies part when looking at 42?
# Peter G. responded on 23rd June 2005 with...
#24 and especially #27 get my vote. #34 is very nice too, but it doesn’t look like it has much to do with web standards. Looks too much like something for a dating service. #27 is really nice.
# Tom responded on 24th June 2005 with...
24 and 25 are sick, I still stick with my previous choice. Allthough 34 is nice.
# Jeff Wheeler responded on 24th June 2005 with...
#24 and #25 are quite exceptional. I’m very impressed!
# Steve Keyworth responded on 24th June 2005 with...
I believe you will find nothing more appropriate than 41.
Truly Stunning.
# Andy B responded on 30th June 2005 with...
I like 27 clean and functional - does what it says on the tin!
Responses are now disabled Your ability to respond is disabled automatically some 30 days after articles are published, or manually much sooner if spamming guttersnipes target a particular article.
Superfluous Aside
Archived in Inspiration, Design & Web
This post's Short URL is http://col.ly/s/452
There are 31 responses
External References
Copyright © Mr. Simon Collison 2003-2012. Protected and licensed under a Creative Commons License. Grab the RSS feed
Engineered in Nottingham, scaffolded by ExpressionEngine, steam-pumped by United & kept alive with tea and roll-ups.